Five-Step Strategy for Problem Solving in Physics

This five-step problem-solving loop is one of the core loops inside the Unisium Study System.

Many students intuitively use parts of this process, but often skip key steps that make problem solving both faster and more reliable. One of the most important—and most overlooked—is Step 3: Physics Modeling.

The core problem-solving framework from Masterful Learning. The book includes worked examples, common pitfalls, and exam-specific applications.

---

Example: Five-Step Strategy in Action

Problem. A 65-kg ninja in an obstacle course competition runs at a speed of 4.0 m/s and then slides down a 2.0-meter-high frictionless ramp. At the bottom of the ramp, the ninja collides with a 35-kg sack hanging straight down from a 5.0-meter-long rope (assume the rope is massless). By holding on to the sack, the ninja swings upward toward a platform. What is the tension in the rope immediately after the collision?

Step 1: Verbal Decoding

Target: $T$
Given: $m_n, m_s, v_0, h, r$.

Step 2: Visual Decoding

Step 3: Physics Modeling

$$\tfrac12 m_n v_0^2 + m_n g h = \tfrac12 m_n v_1^2$$ $$m_n v_1 = m_{\text{tot}} v_2$$ $$\sum F_y = T - m_{\text{tot}} g = m_{\text{tot}} \frac{v_2^2}{r}$$

Step 4: Mathematical Procedures

$$v_0^2 + 2gh = v_1^2$$ $$v_1 = \sqrt{v_0^2 + 2gh}$$ $$v_1 = \sqrt{(4.0)^2 + 2(9.8)(2.0)} = 7.4\ \mathrm{m/s}$$ $$v_2 = \frac{m_n}{m_{\text{tot}}} v_1$$ $$v_2 = \frac{65}{100} \times 7.4 = 4.8\ \mathrm{m/s}$$ $$T = m_{\text{tot}}\left(g + \frac{v_2^2}{r}\right)$$ $$T = 100\left(9.8 + \frac{(4.8)^2}{5.0}\right) = 1.44 \times 10^3\ \mathrm{N}$$

Step 5: Reflection

Dimensional analysis: $[N]=\mathrm{kg\,m\,s^{-2}}$ ✓

Size assessment: $T\approx 1.4\,\mathrm{kN}$ (about $1.5\times$ weight, $980\,\mathrm{N}$) — realistic right after impact.

Interpretation: $T$ increases with $v_2$ (quadratic), decreases with larger $r$; heavier sack raises $m_{\text{tot}}$ but lowers $v_2$, pushing $T$ toward $m_{\text{tot}}g$ in the heavy-sack limit.

---

Continue Learning

Master the technique: For a deeper understanding of how to explain each step in your reasoning process, see our guide on self-explanation — the most effective learning strategy for solving new types of problems.

Go deeper: For comprehensive coverage of problem-solving strategies in physics, math, and programming, check out Masterful Learning — a research-backed approach to developing expertise in any domain.

---

Step 1: Verbal Decoding

Identify the target and given variables.
Some are explicit (“a block with mass 0.100 kg”), others require inference (e.g., “moves at constant speed” → acceleration = 0).

Write them down as:

Target: $\langle$target variables$\rangle$
Given: $\langle$given variables$\rangle$

Skip numerical values at this stage—stay focused on structure, not computation.
This primes your brain to recognize relevant concepts before moving to modeling.

---

Step 2: Visual Decoding

Transform the situation into visual form to reduce working memory load.
This can include:

• Situation sketches – show objects and variables, compacting complexity.
• Diagrams – especially free-body diagrams, which clarify forces and directions.
• Graphs – such as velocity–time or force–displacement, for identifying trends.

Why it matters: Visual tools aren’t just decoration—they’re core thinking aids for physicists. They make modeling easier, help you spot patterns, and reduce mistakes.

---

Step 3: Physics Modeling

With verbal and visual decoding done, apply physics principles to describe the situation in solvable mathematical terms.
On most exams, a correct model is worth 80–90% of the points—even before calculating.

3.1 Check the conditions

Ask:

• Is acceleration constant?
• Are only conservative forces doing work?
• Is net force or torque zero?

3.2 Select principles

Match the conditions to principles:

• Newton’s Second Law if acceleration is non-zero and force/mass are relevant.
• Energy conservation if only conservative forces act.
• Momentum conservation if the system is isolated.

Use principle structures to quickly recognize which principles apply to your problem. (Learning to spot the true name of a problem is what separates experts from novices.)

3.3 Build the mathematical model

Translate principles into equations:

• Use your free-body diagram to project forces along axes.
• For energy, write expressions for kinetic and potential energy at key points.
• Keep equations symbolic; avoid plugging numbers too soon.

Tip: When learning, include all applicable principles, then simplify. This builds the mental library of “solution rules” you’ll later retrieve automatically.

---

Step 4: Mathematical Procedures

Now solve the model for the target variables.
Often this means n equations for n unknowns, solved via algebra.

Best practices:

• Work symbolically as long as possible.
• Rearrange and substitute step-by-step.
• Compute intermediate values to check plausibility.

Symbolic manipulation is essential for recognizing mistakes and enabling interpretation of the physics in the reflection stage.

---

Step 5: Reflection

Before finalizing your answer:

1. Dimensional analysis – check that units match on both sides of the equation.
2. Size evaluation – ask if the magnitude is realistic.
3. Interpretation – look for insights (mass cancels, dependence on height only, etc.).

Why it matters: Reflection catches avoidable errors and deepens your conceptual grasp.

---

Lock It In

Once you’ve solved a problem, extract the key principles you used and test your recall of them through retrieval practice.

If any recall feels shaky, revisit the principle with elaborative encoding to rebuild missing connections. This cycle—encode → explain → retrieve—is how expertise forms.

The Unisium Study System turns this strategy into concrete cards and scheduled sessions, so you repeatedly move through the five steps with retrieval and explanation built in.

---

For exam-focused practice that weaves this physical problem-solving spine into exams, see Why You’re Not Ready for the Math and Physics Exam (and What to Do Instead) and the lightweight Hint and Try loop it recommends whenever you stall.

Key Takeaways

• Don’t skip steps. Each stage builds on the previous.
• Model first, calculate second. Equations without a correct model are wasted effort.
• Reflect to learn. Understanding why your solution works is as important as getting the right number.
• Explain your reasoning. Use self-explanation techniques throughout each step to deepen your understanding and catch errors.

---

FAQ

What is the five-step strategy for solving physics problems?

It’s a structured loop: verbal decoding → visual decoding → physics modeling → mathematical procedures → reflection. The point is to build a correct model (equations + assumptions) before you compute, then use reflection to catch errors and extract what generalizes.

Why is “physics modeling” the most important step?

Because it’s where you translate the situation into principles and constraints (free-body diagrams, conservation laws, conditions). If the model is wrong, clean algebra won’t save you; if the model is right, the math is usually routine.

How long should a five-step solution take on an exam?

Aim to spend most of your time on Steps 1–3 (setup and model) and keep Step 4 efficient by working symbolically. Step 5 can be quick: units, order-of-magnitude, and one sentence of interpretation.

Is the five-step strategy only for physics?

No. The labels are physics-flavored, but the spine is general: decode the target and constraints, represent the situation, apply the right rules, execute, then reflect on errors and takeaways.

---

How This Fits in Unisium

Unisium turns this loop into a repeatable study workflow: you practice decoding and modeling on many short problems, then use guided reflection prompts to extract “next-time” cues you can retrieve under exam pressure. Ready to try it? Start learning with Unisium or explore the full framework in Masterful Learning.

---

← Prev: Self-Explanation | Next → Principle Structures

---

The Five-Step Strategy is domain-general. Learning by doing = learning by solving. Most problems follow the same spine: (1) decode what’s asked (givens, unknowns, constraints), (2) model with principles (pick a workable—not perfect—representation), (3) plan actions that change the problem state (operations that respect the model), (4) execute and check invariants as you go, (5) reflect—what generalizes, what failed, and what trigger would cue this next time? This loop works whether you’re solving physics, debugging code, diagnosing illness, or analyzing strategy.

---